Loving Day, The Warren Court, The rights they want to erase
Release Date: 06/12/2025
ellisconversations's podcast
Choosing “The Lesser Evil” In this episode, the hosts discuss how the phrase “Lesser of two Evils” has been overworked in the election context. It has been applied when one or neither of the choices meets the definition of “evil” but rather the view of the voter that both candidates are flawed in some way. The hosts submit that when faced with such a perceived dilemma, the person should use their vote to cause the least harmful outcome. Jamil Ellis and his father, retired Federal Magistrate Judge Ronald Louis Ellis, explore the difference between accepting a candidate’s flaws and...
info_outlineellisconversations's podcast
Original Intent: How traditionally excluded people are targeted for removal when they show up in “the wrong space.” In this episode, the Hosts discuss the case of Jason Arday and why history suggests that the intense scrutiny and media coverage he faced may not be simply a concern about qualifications, or lack thereof. In March 2023, Jason Arday made history as the youngest Black person ever appointed to a professorship at the University of Cambridge. Celebrated for an extraordinary journey that took him to one of the world’s most prestigious universities, Arday became a...
info_outlineellisconversations's podcast
The Trump administration has opened a new front in its campaign against diversity, equity, and inclusion: the federal tax code. In this mini episode of Ellis Conversations, Jamil Ellis and retired Federal Magistrate Judge Ronald Ellis respond to a proposed Treasury Department and IRS rule that could strip private schools, colleges, and universities of their tax-exempt status if they operate admissions, scholarship, financial-aid, or student-support programs that consider race. They examine whether the executive branch should have the authority to redefine which educational institutions qualify...
info_outlineellisconversations's podcast
In this episode of Ellis Conversations, Jamil Ellis and retired Federal Magistrate Judge Hon. Ronald L. Ellis continue their two-part conversation on employment discrimination, civil-rights enforcement, and the future of equal opportunity. Part One looked at the history of employment discrimination law, disparate impact, and the role of the EEOC, Justice Department, courts, and civil-rights lawyers in building protections for workers. In Part Two, the conversation turns to a newer and less visible frontier: algorithmic hiring systems. Jamil and Judge Ellis discuss what happens when software...
info_outlineellisconversations's podcast
In this episode of Ellis Conversations, Jamil Ellis and retired Federal Magistrate Judge Hon. Ronald L. Ellis begin a two-part conversation on employment discrimination, civil-rights enforcement, and the future of equal opportunity in America. Prompted by recent reporting on the Trump administration’s retreat from discrimination enforcement — including the Justice Department, EEOC, and other federal agencies stepping back from disparate-impact cases — Jamil asks Judge Ellis to help explain how we got the workplace protections we have today, why they matter, and what may be lost when...
info_outlineellisconversations's podcast
In this episode, the Hosts discuss America’s struggle to make real the promise of equality embodied in its founding documents depite periodic efforts to restrict who should be able to live that dream.
info_outlineellisconversations's podcast
In this episode of Ellis Conversations, co-host Jamil Ellis sits down again with his father, retired federal magistrate Judge Ronald Ellis, to mark Loving Day — the anniversary of Loving v. Virginia, the 1967 Supreme Court case that struck down bans on interracial marriage. What starts as a reflection on Loving Day quickly becomes a powerful and wide-ranging discussion about: How distorted historical narratives fuel today’s rollback of civil rights Why anti-DEI forces rely on historical erasure The forgotten legal barriers against women The dangerous nostalgia embedded in the “Make...
info_outlineellisconversations's podcast
The hosts discuss how desegregation under Brown was hampered in schools by a policy of “all deliberate speed” where the speed was often zero. In contrast, and despite the fact that in large portions of the nation education is separate and unequal, the Trump administration has begun an “all speed ahead” policy of eliminating decrees which contained desegregation requirements'. In this episode of Ellis Conversations, co-host Jamil Ellis and his father, retired federal magistrate Judge Ronald Ellis, reflect on the 71st anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education—not...
info_outlineellisconversations's podcast
In this episode, the hosts discuss Project 2025 and its potential impact in a Donald Trump administration. Heritage Foundation and Trump Biden’s Judicial Appointments Trump bankruptcies The Nation on the Heirtage Foundation Project 2025 Trump Administration people at Heritage Trump on baby Tiffany’s body. Platforms - https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/2016-republican-party-platform Related episodes
info_outlineellisconversations's podcast
In this episode, the hosts begin a series of discussions on the historical significance of voting, efforts to prevent some groups from voting, and why you should exercise your right to vote even if you don’t like the choices. Do what you can, where you are, with what you have. - In American politics, the Southern strategy was a electoral strategy to increase political support among white voters in the by appealing to . Voter ID by State Student ID to Vote
info_outlineIn this episode of Ellis Conversations, co-host Jamil Ellis sits down again with his father, retired federal magistrate Judge Ronald Ellis, to mark Loving Day — the anniversary of Loving v. Virginia, the 1967 Supreme Court case that struck down bans on interracial marriage.
What starts as a reflection on Loving Day quickly becomes a powerful and wide-ranging discussion about:
- How distorted historical narratives fuel today’s rollback of civil rights
- Why anti-DEI forces rely on historical erasure
- The forgotten legal barriers against women
- The dangerous nostalgia embedded in the “Make America Great Again” slogan
- A look at Project 2025, the Federalist Society, and how today’s Supreme Court is targeting many of the Warren Court’s civil rights decisions
From All in the Family to Sidney Poitier, from welfare state debates to voting rights, Judge Ellis breaks down the legal and cultural legacy at stake.
Relevant Links & Resources:
-
Loving v. Virginia (1967)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1966/395 -
Warren Court Key Decisions
Brown v. Board (1954): https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/347us483
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): https://www.oyez.org/cases/1962/155
Miranda v. Arizona (1966): https://www.oyez.org/cases/1965/759
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965): https://www.oyez.org/cases/1964/496
Engel v. Vitale (1962): https://www.oyez.org/cases/1961/468
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969): https://www.oyez.org/cases/1968/21 -
Project 2025: https://www.project2025.org
-
Federalist Society: https://fedsoc.org
-
All In The Family theme reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_in_the_Family