The Big Myth Of The Sales A Player

When we read commentary about how we should be recruiting A Players to boost our firm’s performance, this is a mirage for most of us running smaller sized companies.  If you are the size of a Google or a Facebook, with massively deep pockets, then having A Players everywhere is no issue.  The reality is A Players cost a bomb and so most of us can’t afford that type of talent luxury.  Instead we have to cut our cloth to suit our budgets.  We hire C Players and then we try to turn them into B Players.  Why not turn these B Players into A players?

This is a contradiction isn’t it, because we always striving and thrusting for the best possible results.  If we invest and take a B Player to A Player status, there is a very strong likelihood someone else will admire our handiwork and poach them from us.  We have all heard that truism about “what if I develop my people and they leave”, countered with “what if we don’t invest in them and they stay?’.  This is correct up to the point of your cash flow reserves.  We are not talking about having useless people staying on, sucking up our cash resources.

B Players are very capable and are worth investing in to become even more capable.  The additional investment to turn them into A players though, if they have that capability in the first place, may be a case of over investment. Having large portions of your revenue centered around a very small number of clients is recognized as a very dangerous position to be in.  In the same way, having one or two people accounting for a disproportionate amount of firm income or expertise is also dangerous.

When the top performers leave it can be very disruptive. Most bosses do not sufficiently explain their departure to the remaining staff.  In this vacuum, the other members of the team worry about what the A Players know that they don’t.  Is the firm going down and are those most capable of getting another job jumping ship?  Will an exodus of A Players introduce fragility into the business? The loss of the contribution of A Players is bad enough, but their departure can be interpreted by staff in ways bosses would never imagine.  That is why no matter who leaves, leaders always need to carefully reassure everyone else, that the firm is fine and this was a personal choice by one individual.  Don’t allow rumours, imaginings and guesswork to creep into the equation.  We need to own the narrative every time.

I have a very carefully designed spreadsheet which allows me to track my sales team’s performance.  It includes all of their costs and related costs, to give me a clear picture of what each sales person’s contribution to the company actually is.  This allows me to see the amount of leverage they represent. I want to know what is the multiple of their revenue return against their total cost.  The bigger that multiple the better, up to a point.

If the multiple is fantastic, but the overall income volume generated is too low, then we can go broke in short order.  So there has to be a balance between raw volume of funds coming in and the effectiveness of return on their efforts.  This is where B Players can excel.  They produce multiples which work for the business and generate a positive profit result.  The A Players can have bigger numbers, but their multiples may not be that outstanding.  They also point to their big numbers and say rude things like “I want more money”.  That pay rise to keep them will hammer the attractiveness of their multiple pretty quickly.

 A Players are like an oasis in the desert.  The vision through the heat haze can lure small business owners to invest, when that may not be the best idea.  It can be better, over time, to build the ranks of the B players from the within the ranks of the C Players.  This is the classis bootstrap approach to building companies.  We all do it at the beginning don’t we, but then with some success comes hubris and we start to imagine we can extrapolate our genius.  Before you know it, the multiples have swung in the wrong direction.  For this reason, it is wise to track the multiples down to the last cent and determine to keep on tracking. 

When you are small, love your B Players and hold them close.  Invest in them, but don’t over invest.  Where is that elusive line of demarcation?  Experience watching newly minted A Players, who were once your B Players, heading for the exits and more money, helps to establish it in your mind. Monitoring the multiple components will create an algorithm indicating how much is enough and how much is too much.  We won’t always get it right, but we can get pretty close if we pay careful attention to the issue.  Remember this is art, but with big servings of science tossed into the mix.